317-695-7700

Indiana Criminal Stalking Law by Criminal Attorney Jeff Cardella

 Criminal Stalking Law in Indiana by Criminal Attorney Jeff Cardella

If you have a Criminal Stalking case in Indiana and need a top rated criminal defense attorney, call me at 317-695-7700 or email me for a free consultation. I have been a criminal attorney in Indiana for my entire legal career, was selected as one of the Top 100 Attorneys by the National Trial Lawyers Association, have served as a Judge pro tem, have nearly two decades of experience and taught criminal law at the IU McKinney School of Law.

Navigating the complexities of criminal stalking charges in Indiana requires a clear understanding of the state’s laws. These regulations are designed to protect individuals from repeated behaviors that cause fear or distress, but they can sometimes be misinterpreted in everyday situations.

Understanding the Legal Definition of Stalking in Indiana

Under Indiana Code 35-45-10-1, “stalk” refers to a knowing or intentional course of conduct that involves repeated or continuing harassment of another person. This behavior must be such that it would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened, and it must actually cause the victim to experience those feelings. Importantly, this definition excludes activities that are protected by statutes or the constitution, like lawful protests.

Harassment, as outlined in Indiana Code 35-45-10-2, is a key component. It includes repeated or continuing impermissible contact directed at the victim that would lead a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress, and does in fact cause such distress. Examples might include unwanted phone calls, texts, or physical following, but context matters greatly in these cases.

Key Elements Required for a Stalking Conviction

  • The conduct must be intentional or knowing.
  • It involves repeated actions, not a single incident.
  • The behavior causes reasonable fear or distress.
  • Actual emotional impact on the victim must be proven.

Prosecutors in Indianapolis and across Indiana must establish all these elements beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction in criminal stalking cases.

Penalties Associated with Criminal Stalking Charges in Indiana

According to Indiana Code 35-45-10-5, basic criminal stalking is classified as a Level 6 felony. This can result in imprisonment from six months to two and a half years, along with fines up to $10,000. However, the severity increases based on specific circumstances.

Aggravating Factors That Elevate Charges

If the stalking involves threats of sexual battery, serious injury, or death, or violates a protective order, it becomes a Level 5 felony, punishable by one to six years in prison and fines up to $10,000. Use of a tracking device also elevates it to this level.

For Level 4 felony status, which carries two to twelve years imprisonment and similar fines, the offense must involve a deadly weapon or a prior unrelated stalking conviction against the same victim.

Beyond direct penalties, convictions can lead to long-term consequences like difficulty finding employment or housing in Indianapolis due to a criminal record.

Common Defenses in Indiana Stalking Cases

Defending against stalking charges in Indiana often involves challenging the prosecution’s evidence. Common strategies include:

  • Lack of intent: Showing the actions were not meant to harass or frighten.
  • Insufficient repetition: Proving the behavior was isolated rather than ongoing.
  • No reasonable fear: Arguing that a typical person wouldn’t feel threatened.
  • False allegations: Demonstrating motives like revenge in custody disputes.
  • Constitutional issues: Claiming violations of free speech or due process.

In Indianapolis courts, thorough investigation of digital evidence, like messages or location data, is crucial for building these defenses.

A Real-World Example: Successful Defense Against Stalking Allegations

In one notable case I handled in Indiana, a client faced criminal stalking charges based on what was admittedly very unusual behavior toward an acquaintance. The prosecution alleged that the conduct would cause any reasonable person distress. I argued that the evidence showed only a single peculiar incident without any follow-up conduct. 

While the client’s actions were admittedly odd, they did not satisfy the legal requirement of repeated or continuing harassment under Indiana’s stalking definition. By highlighting the lack of multiple incidents and challenging the claim of ongoing behavior, I successfully argued that the situation fell short of the statutory threshold. The Judge granted our motion to dismiss after the State rested, illustrating how precise application of the law can protect against overreach in stalking prosecutions.

Related Offenses: Cyberstalking, Tracking Devices, and Aerial Harassment

Indiana doesn’t have a separate cyberstalking statute, but online behaviors like repeated threatening emails or social media harassment fall under general stalking laws if they meet the criteria. Penalties remain the same.

Unlawful use of a tracking device, per Indiana Code 35-46-8.5-1, is a Class A misdemeanor that can elevate stalking to a Level 5 felony when combined.

Remote aerial harassment, involving drones under Indiana Code 35-45-11, is another related charge, starting as a Class A misdemeanor and potentially escalating with priors.

The Role of Protective Orders in Stalking Cases

Protective orders, issued under Indiana Code 34-26-5, are common in stalking situations to prevent contact. Violating one can aggravate charges. No-contact orders during pretrial or probation serve similar purposes. Understanding these can be vital in Indianapolis stalking defense strategies.

Misconceptions About Stalking Laws in Indiana

One common myth is that a single unwanted contact constitutes stalking; however, repetition is essential. Another is that only physical following counts—digital actions can qualify too. Additionally, some believe intent doesn’t matter, but the law requires knowing conduct.

Frequently Asked Questions on Criminal Stalking in Indiana

What is the difference between harassment and stalking?

Harassment involves impermissible contact causing distress, while stalking requires a course of such conduct that’s repeated.

Can social media activity lead to stalking charges?

Yes, if it’s repeated and causes reasonable fear, it can fall under Indiana stalking laws.

What should I do if accused of stalking?

Avoid contact with the accuser and seek legal guidance immediately to build a defense.

Is stalking always a felony in Indiana?

Yes, starting at Level 6, with potential elevations based on factors.

Can charges be expunged?

Depending on the outcome and time passed, Indiana allows expungement for certain records.

Contact My Office for a Free Consultation

If you have questions about Indiana’s Criminal Stalking law, call me for a free consultation to discuss your case.

Phone: 317-695-7700

Email: jeffcardella@cardellalawoffice.com

Address: 350 Massachusetts Ave #357, Indianapolis, IN 46204


I handle cases throughout all of Indiana, including the Federal District Courts and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The main geographic areas that I practice law in are:

DISCLAIMER - The information contained on this website is provided for educational and informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice or as an offer to perform legal services on any subject matter. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments or information. The information is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or current. We make no warranty, expressed, or implied, about the accuracy or reliability of the information at this website or at any other website to which it is linked. Recipients of content from this site should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in the site without seeking appropriate legal advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an Indiana Criminal Defense attorney or attorney licensed in the recipient’s state. Nothing herein is intended to create an attorney-client relationship and shall not be construed as legal advice. This is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.